At the same time, during a period of time where the warp is notably calm, we've seen people take years to cross a relatively short distance.Ĭlick to shrink.As others have REPEATEDLY pointed out, wanting to outnumber your enemy is all well and good, but the borg are still, fundamentally, the ones with the mobility advantage, and the most control over when and whether to engage fleet on fleet actions. It isn't always slow, it isn't always fast, but even when the warp is thrashing about, we've seen people cross the galaxy in hours, days, and months. So unless I've been reading the wrong books with literally 20 different small Loyalist fleets from the Shattered Legions going around hunting down traitors and even chasing Primarchs down in attempted assassination missions, warp travel isn't as slow as people say, but it CAN be. If the Imperium took years to cross the galaxy there would have been like 20 actual engagements instead of the massive galaxy spanning war that was the Horus Heresy. They aren't as slow as some people claim, as OnTheRag mentioned, with one of the most turbulent times concerning the warp had massive fleets cross the galaxy to engage one another, break off, split apart, attack important targets or pull off missions integral to the war, then group up to attack fortified blockades and such. In this fight they could quite literally send every ship they have at the enemy and keep making more. This message was edited 1 time.I mean the standard Imperium tactic for enemies that are more durable is to outnumber them in any engagement. I have, both the Ignatius and NIV versions.Īutomatically Appended Next am not particularly certain on the origin of incubi, but you have to remember that Christian daemonology (and other surrounding non cannonical mythology) is drawn from many sources in the early period middle east, most of it predating Christ, let alone aspects of the Hebrew religion. Essentially you are both right, especially in reference to 40k.Īnd before anyone comes back with a read it comment. While the basis of the story is there (spread out across huge swaths of text), the narrative version which many people follow (and which most closely resembles the 40k story) is drawn out of Medival morality plays and later Paradise Lost. I would suggest reading it and understanding before making such comments the fall of Lucifer is primarily a literary invention the tragic, rebellious archetype on which Horus is based was primarily Milton's creation. Almost none of which is actually in the Bible.
0 kommentar(er)
